Skip to content
About Tifalon

A practical partner for planning green hydrogen projects

Tifalon is a London-based team that helps organizations turn green hydrogen concepts into deliverable programs. Our role sits between early strategy and delivery: we clarify requirements, map interfaces across power, water, compression, storage, and end-use, and ensure safety and operations are considered alongside performance and cost. We focus on engineering clarity, not hype, so stakeholders can make informed decisions and move forward with a robust plan.

We were founded in 2017 with the goal of making low-carbon energy projects easier to execute. Over time we have specialized in green hydrogen because it connects renewables to industrial demand and mobility, and it can provide long-duration storage where batteries are not always the right tool. Our work is designed to support your internal team and delivery partners with structured outputs you can use.

engineers reviewing green hydrogen plant layout and safety zones in London office
Safety-first delivery

We treat hazardous area thinking, operating procedures, and stakeholder approvals as core design inputs, not late-stage paperwork.

Integration clarity

We map interfaces across utilities, controls, storage, and offtake so procurement and commissioning risks are easier to manage.

Where we work

Based at 10 Finsbury Square, London, EC2A 1AF. We support UK and EU stakeholders and coordinate with delivery partners globally as needed.

Why green hydrogen, and why now

Green hydrogen is a way to convert renewable electricity into a transportable molecule. By splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen, electrolysers produce fuel that can be stored for hours to weeks and used where direct electrification is difficult. This matters for sectors that need high-temperature heat, continuous chemical feedstocks, or high-energy-density refuelling for heavy vehicles. The value is not theoretical; it depends on how the system is engineered, operated, and integrated with local constraints.

Many projects struggle because early assumptions are not tested against power profiles, water treatment needs, compression energy, and practical safety boundaries. Our work reduces that gap by turning an ambition into a set of engineering decisions and delivery steps. We also make trade-offs explicit so your team can align around what matters most: output stability, total energy use, safety management, footprint, or integration with existing assets.

Energy system fit

We assess how variable renewable supply interacts with electrolyser operation, storage buffers, and demand patterns. The aim is to reduce curtailment and avoid unrealistic expectations about continuous output.

Water and utilities

We help teams quantify water volumes, quality requirements, and treatment steps, plus cooling and heat considerations that influence the balance of plant and operating procedures.

Storage decisions

Storage is often the biggest constraint on footprint and permitting. We guide teams through compressed storage, liquefaction, and logistics options based on duty cycle and site layout.

Safety and operations

We structure safety considerations into design decisions: ventilation, zoning, interfaces, and operating workflows that support safe refuelling and facility operation.

What you can expect from us

We work with your team to define a clear scope, produce transparent assumptions, and document outputs that can be used by project sponsors, safety reviewers, and delivery partners. We do not promise guaranteed outcomes or make claims about project approvals. Our focus is improving the quality of decisions, reducing avoidable rework, and building a plan that matches your site and stakeholder realities.

How we work with your team

We keep projects moving by focusing on the handoffs that often slow hydrogen programs: uncertain interfaces, unclear operating assumptions, and incomplete documentation for stakeholder reviews. Our work can be used to support internal business cases, technical specifications, early procurement conversations, and alignment across operations and safety teams. We adapt to your governance model and prefer short feedback loops so assumptions are corrected early.

If you reach out, we ask for only what is necessary: your project goal, a point of contact, and a short description of the site and intended use. We do not request sensitive personal information. Our contact forms reference our Privacy Policy and you can request deletion of inquiry records by emailing our privacy address.

Core principles

  • Transparent assumptions

    We write down what is known and unknown, including the input data that drives sizing and operating cost sensitivity.

  • Operational realism

    We consider start-up, maintenance windows, refuelling workflows, and staffing needs so the design can be operated safely and consistently.

  • Safety as a design input

    Layout, zoning, ventilation, and emergency planning are treated as key constraints that shape the overall architecture.

  • Stakeholder-ready outputs

    We structure deliverables so they can be reviewed by non-specialists without losing the engineering intent and traceability.